Abstract
The Golden Rule is the ethical point most frequently compared in Jesus and Confucius;1 in each case, what is recommended is preconsideration of one’s own actions toward other people in the light of an imaginative projection of how it would be if the roles were reversed. The formulations in both look substantively identical.2 Yet the positive formulation of Jesus and the negative formulation of Confucius actually shape the substance and import of the precept in distinctive ways. Moreover, there may be a deeper level at which, while they are certainly not contradictory, these two formulations are expressions of an important register of ontological difference. Engaged thoughtfully, they nonetheless afford to ethical modeling an opportunity for “harmony in diversity,” complementarity rather than mere equivalence. I argue here that the two traditions can be mutually enhancing, each through knowledge of and sympathy for the other.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Cultural Studies
Reference23 articles.
1. “The Golden Rule as the Core Value in Confucianism and Christianity: Ethical Similarities and Differences”;Alinson;Asian Philosophy,1992
2. “Family Love in Confucius and Mencius”;An;Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy,2008
3. “American Confucianism”;Cai;Journal of Chinese Philosophy,2005
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. ANNUAL BIBLIOGRAPHY;Early China;2016