Assessing Cognitive Bias in Korean and Indonesian Scientists: Considering Sociocultural Factors in Judgment and Choice

Author:

Sya’bandari Yustika1ORCID,Meilani-Fadillah Sarah1ORCID,Nurlaelasari-Rusmana Ai1ORCID,Qurota-Aini Rahmi2ORCID,Ha Minsu1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University https://dx.doi.org/34962 1 Kangwondaehak-gil, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, 24341 Republic of Korea

2. Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University https://dx.doi.org/5235 Murfreesboro, TN 37132 USA

Abstract

Abstract There has been the growing concern about excessive numbers of false-positive results published in the scientific literature. Cognitive bias plays a considerable role in triggering false findings that involve indirect and unwitting self-deception by scientists. This study considers the sociocultural differences in cognitive bias between Korean and Indonesian scientists. A cognitive bias assessment (CBA) was developed and administered to 184 professors, lecturer assistants, doctoral students, and master’s students in South Korea and Indonesia. The CBA results revealed some similar response patterns between Korean and Indonesian scientists. Additionally, the detection of 19 potential differential item functionings (DIFs) demonstrates the influence of sociocultural factors on how scientists interpret to each item. Finally, the Indonesian scientists scored significantly higher in optimism and belief bias. This study discusses the importance of awareness of cognitive biases, particularly the role of science education to reduce biases through systematic thinking, reasoning, and judgment by understanding scientific methods.

Funder

National Research Foundation of Korea

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Education

Reference85 articles.

1. Is it time for studying real life debiasing? Evaluation of the effectiveness of an analogical intervention technique;Aczel, B.

2. Addressing challenges to a systematic thinking pattern of scientists: A literature review of cognitive bias in scientific work;Aini, R. Q.

3. Cross-cultural differences in managing businesses: applying Hofstede cultural analysis in Germany, Canada, South Korea and Morocco;Al-Alawi, A.

4. Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases;Babcock, L.

5. Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation;Baumgartner, H.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3