Test–Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of an fMRI-Compatible Pneumatic Vibrator to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors

Author:

Goossens Nina1,Janssens Lotte12,Pijnenburg Madelon1,Caeyenberghs Karen3,Van Rompuy Charlotte1,Meugens Paul1,Sunaert Stefan4,Brumagne Simon1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven — University of Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, Box 1501, 3001 Leuven, Belgium

2. Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

3. School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne Campus (St Patrick), Locked Bag 4115, Fitzroy MDC, VIC 3065, Australia

4. Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven — University of Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49, Box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Processing proprioceptive information in the brain is essential for optimal postural control and can be studied with proprioceptive stimulation, provided by muscle vibration, during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Classic electromagnetic muscle vibrators, however, cannot be used in the high-strength magnetic field of the fMRI scanner. Pneumatic vibrators offer an fMRI-compatible alternative. However, whether these devices produce reliable and valid proprioceptive stimuli has not been investigated, although this is essential for these devices to be used in longitudinal research. Test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of the postural response to muscle vibration, provided by custom-made fMRI-compatible pneumatic vibrators, were assessed in a repeated-measures design. Mean center of pressure (CoP) displacements during, respectively, ankle muscle and back muscle vibration (45–60 Hz, 0.5 mm) provided by an electromagnetic and a pneumatic vibrator were measured in ten young healthy subjects. The test was repeated on the same day and again within one week. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess (a) intra- and interday reliability of the postural responses to, respectively, pneumatic and electromagnetic vibration, and (b) concurrent validity of the response to pneumatic compared to electromagnetic vibration. Test–retest reliability of mean CoP displacements during pneumatic vibration was good to excellent (ICCs = 0.64–0.90) and resembled that of responses to electromagnetic vibration (ICCs = 0.64–0.94). Concurrent validity of the postural effect of pneumatic vibration was good to excellent (ICCs = 0.63–0.95). In conclusion, the proposed fMRI-compatible pneumatic vibrator can be used with confidence to stimulate muscle spindles during fMRI to study central processing of proprioception.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference54 articles.

1. Head and neck position sense;Armstrong;Sports Med.,2008

2. Ankle instability is associated with balance impairments: a meta-analysis;Arnold;Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.,2009

3. Proprioceptive thresholds at the ankle: implications for the prevention of ligament injury;Ashton-Miller,2000

4. Motor network changes associated with successful motor skill relearning after acute ischemic stroke: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study;Askim;Neurorehabil. Neural Repair,2009

5. Sensory processing in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease: investigations with 3D H(2)(15)O-PET;Boecker;Brain,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3