Affiliation:
1. Queen’s University Department of Psychology, Humphrey Hall 307, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON K7L3K9, Canada
Abstract
During conversations, we engage in turn-taking behaviour that proceeds back and forth effortlessly as we communicate. In any given day, we participate in numerous face-to-face interactions that contain social cues from our partner and we interpret these cues to rapidly identify whether it is appropriate to speak. Although the benefit provided by visual cues has been well established in several areas of communication, the use of visual information to make turn-taking decisions during conversation is unclear. Here we conducted two experiments to investigate the role of visual information in identifying conversational turn exchanges. We presented clips containing single utterances spoken by single individuals engaged in a natural conversation with another. These utterances were from either right before a turn exchange (i.e., when the current talker would finish and the other would begin) or were utterances where the same talker would continue speaking. In Experiment 1, participants were presented audiovisual, auditory-only and visual-only versions of our stimuli and identified whether a turn exchange would occur or not. We demonstrated that although participants could identify turn exchanges with unimodal information alone, they performed best in the audiovisual modality. In Experiment 2, we presented participants audiovisual turn exchanges where the talker, the listener or both were visible. We showed that participants suffered a cost at identifying turns exchanges when visual cues from the listener were not available. Overall, we demonstrate that although auditory information is sufficient for successful conversation, visual information plays an important role in the overall efficiency of communication.
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference56 articles.
1. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items;Baayen;J. Mem. Lang.,2007
2. Crossmodal and incremental of audiovisual cues to emotional speech;Barkhyusen;Lang. Speech,2010
3. Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: cognitive or affective?;Baron-Cohen;J. Autism Dev. Disord.,1988
4. Gestures specialized for dialogue;Bavelas;Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull.,1995
5. Listener responses as a collaborative process: the role of gaze;Bavelas;J. Comm.,2002
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献