Affiliation:
1. Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela University, P.O. Box 77000, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa
Abstract
Abstract
Optimally foraging animals should minimise time spent foraging in order to perform other fitness-enhancing activities. The ruminants’ more efficient digestive system, requiring lower volumes of forage, is predicted to provide an advantage over hindgut fermenters with respect to foraging effort, but this may be offset by their need for higher quality forage. We contrasted the activity of two similarly-sized, syntopic grazers, black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), a ruminant, and Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra), a hindgut fermenter, using camera trap data and tested the volume-requirement and the nutrient-driven hypotheses, seasonally. Zebra and wildebeest activity varied seasonally, potentially due to differences in resource availability. In winter, a greater proportion of wildebeest were recorded grazing relative to zebra, supporting the nutrient-driven hypothesis, whilst the inverse occurred (although not significantly) in summer, supporting the volume-requirement hypothesis. Seasonal variation in resources may provide temporal foraging trade-offs of benefits for ruminants and hindgut fermenters.
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference39 articles.
1. R package ‘circular’: circular statistics;Agostinelli, C.
2. Comparison of the diurnal activity patterns of blue wildebeest and red hartebeest;Ben-Shahar, N.
3. Activity patterns in a population of free-ranging wildebeest Connochaetes laurinlis at Etosha National Park;Berry, H.H.
4. Foraging behavior: dynamics of dining out;Bunnell, F.
5. An objective approach to determining the weight ranges of prey preferred by and accessible to the five large African carnivores;Clements, H.S.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献