Affiliation:
1. Stanford UniversityUSA
2. USA
3. United Arab Emirates
Abstract
AbstractMany notable female sociologists have vanished from the canonical history of American sociology. As the most influential crowd-sourced encyclopedia, Wikipedia promises – but does not necessarily deliver – a democratic corrective to the generation of knowledge, including academic knowledge. This article explores multiple mechanisms by which women either enter or disappear from the disciplinary record by analyzing the unfolding interaction between the canonical disciplinary history of sociology and Wikipedia. We argue that the uneven representation of women sociologists as (1) remembered, (2) neglected, (3) erased or, finally, (4) recovered is shaped by the emerging interactional space of knowledge production.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Department and Discipline
2. “Women in Social Stratification: A Case of Intellectual Sexism,”;Acker;American Journal of Sociology,1973
3. Sociological Theory
4. “1-800-How-Am-I-Driving? Agency in Social Science History,”;Adams;Social Science History,2011
5. “Wikipedia, Sociology, and the Promise and Pitfalls of Big Data.”;Adams;Big Data & Society,2015
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献