Statistical Innovation in the Global South

Author:

Villacis Byron1ORCID,Thiel Alena2ORCID,Capistrano Daniel3ORCID,Carvalho da Silva Christyne4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of California Berkeley, California USA

2. University of Halle Halle an der Saale Germany

3. University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

4. National Institute of Educational Studies and Investigations Brasília Brazil

Abstract

Abstract This article proposes a comparative socio-economic history of quantification in Ecuador, Brazil, Ghana and Sierra Leone. It narrows in on censuses in the Global South as sites of methodological and infrastructural innovation in the context of global circulations of model population data systems, methodological standards, and material infrastructures. Specifically, the authors ask which arrangements of actors, norms and settings are involved in the reception, translation and adaptation of statistical innovation and how uneven relations and compositions of power between and within these fields shape the process of transmission. Distilling from their explorative, hermeneutic approach, the authors explore the mechanisms that link variously positioned political fields (Bourdieu, 1985) in the production and implementation of statistical innovation in the Global South. Four mechanisms are identified that shape statistical innovation as process of reception of globally circulating models and ideas as well as their adaptations into specific fields, all of which have differentiated effects and play under certain conditions in parallel or combined ways: 1) interventionist impulses from international organizations, 2) commercial and institutional brokerage, 3) initiatives from local professional communities, and 4) effects of political instabilities.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference91 articles.

1. Chiefs: Economic Development and Elite Control of Civil Society in Sierra Leone;Acemoglu, Daron

2. Kemmerer En Ecuador;Almeida, Rebeca

3. Of Techno-Ethics and Techno-Affects;Amrute, Sareeta

4. Anderson, Margo and Stephen Fienberg 2000. Who Counts?: The Politics of Census- Taking in Contemporary America.

5. The Modern Census: Evolution, Examples and Evaluation;Baffour, Bernard

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3