Affiliation:
1. International Survey Center Reno, Nevada USA
2. University of Nevada Reno, Nevada USA
Abstract
Abstract
Everywhere, education is well rewarded, roughly 5% to 15% for each additional year of university, hence a major source of income inequality. Why do ordinary people see income rewards to education as legitimate? Two key theories: (1) their moral views might align with classical equity arguments asserting a moral entitlement to rewards in proportion to contributions. (2) Alternatively, they might see rewards to education as fair returns on investment, a morally infused folk version of human capital. These share almost all their predictions, but they differ if an employer fully finances the education. Analysis of a large representative Australian sample reveals that the public’s ideal returns to education match equity justifications (~80%), not economists’ fair return on investments (~10%).
Funder
Institute of Advanced Studies, The Australian National University
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference88 articles.
1. Who Should Get What? Fairness Judgments of the Distribution of Earnings;Alves, Wayne M.
2. Aristotle’s Politics. [2nd Edition, Carnes Lord, Translator];Aristotle
3. Top Incomes over the Twentieth Century: A Contrast between Continental European and English Speaking Countries;Atkinson, Anthony B.
4. An International Comparison of Attitudes to Inequality;Austen, Siobhan
5. Language, Truth and Logic;Ayer, A. J.