Affiliation:
1. National Taiwan University https://dx.doi.org/33561 Taiwan Taipei
2. National Taiwan Ocean University https://dx.doi.org/34880 Taiwan Keelung City
Abstract
AbstractTaiwan began to systematically introduce social innovation as a tool for social reform after the 2008 financial crisis. Although most research on social innovation in Taiwan focuses on problem-solving methods based on the utilitarian perspectives of the public and private sectors, an analytical framework from the societal perspective is proposed in this article. We classify social innovation conducted by the public, private, and civil society sectors as either incremental or radical. This article seeks to provide an overview of the development of social innovation in Taiwan and to answer two main questions. First, how do Taiwan’s government and the private sector mainstream incremental social innovation, and what is its influence? Second, how does a radical approach emerge under this influence? This article illustrates how political and social contexts shape the development of social innovation and uses deliberative democracy in practice as a case study to show how radical social innovation emerges and develops.
Reference57 articles.
1. Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S., and Zimmer, A. (2016a). Social Innovation: A Sympathetic and Critical Interpretation. In: T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, and A. Zimmer, eds., Social Innovations in the Urban Context, Cham: Springer, pp. 3–18. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8.
2. Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S., and Zimmer, A. (2016b). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Social Innovation. In: T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, and A. Zimmer, eds., Social Innovations in the Urban Context, Cham: Springer, pp. 303–310. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8.
3. B Current Impact Investment. (n.d.). The Portfolio: B Current Supports and Escorts New Social Enterprises. Available at: https://bcurrent.asia/ (accessed 15 September 2022).
4. Chen, D.-S. (2021). Social Construction of Public Sociology: A Case Study of Deliberative Democracy Engagement in Taiwan. In: L. Hossfeld, E.B. Kelly, and C. Hossfeld, eds., The Routledge International Handbook of Public Sociology, London: Routledge, pp. 133–143.
5. Chen, D.-S. and Deng, C.-Y. (2007). Interaction between Citizens and Experts in Public Deliberation: A Case Study of Consensus Conferences in Taiwan. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 1, pp. 77–97.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献