Abstract
The Jesus Myth theory is the view that the person known as Jesus of Nazareth had no historical existence. Throughout the centuries this view has had a few but notable adherents such as Bruno Bauer, Arthur Drews, G.A. Wells, and Robert M. Price. Recently, Richard Carrier’s work On the Historicity of Jesus (Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2014) has attempted to reexamine the question in a rigorous academic fashion. According to Carrier, within the earliest days of Christianity, Jesus was not understood as a historic-human figure, but rather as a celestial-angelic being, akin to Gabriel in Islam or to Moroni in Mormonism, and only came to be understood as a historical person later. While Carrier’s hypothesis is problematic and unpersuasive, there are several key points related to his work that this article specifically challenges and critiques.
Subject
Religious studies,History,Linguistics and Language
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Quest for the Historical Jesus, 2000–2023;Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus;2023-04-04
2. Re-examining the Pre-Christian Jesus;Journal of Early Christian History;2022-02-15
3. ‘More Ingenious than Learned’? Examining the Quest for the Non-Historical Jesus;New Testament Studies;2019-09-06
4. Revolutionary Contexts for the Quest;Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus;2019-05-15
5. The Historical and Human Existence of Jesus in Paul’s Letters;Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus;2018-12-06