Abstract
AbstractEven though more than a decade has passed since the creation of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the law of the most fundamental concept in international criminal law – mens rea – remains unsettled. Through its jurisprudence, the Yugoslavia Tribunal has made enormous efforts to assign different degrees of mens rea for different categories of crimes under its Statute. The present study is an attempt to clarify several issues with regard to the law of mens rea as developed in the case law of the Yugoslavia Tribunal. Among these issues are the following: what precisely is to be understood by the terms "specific intent", "special intent", "dolus specialis", or "surplus intent"? Similarly, what are the precise meanings of the terms "deliberately", "intention", "intent", "intentionally", "wilful or wilfully", "knowledge", and "wanton" as provided for in the ICTY Statute or as employed by the Chambers within its judgments.
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The legal limits to the destruction of natural resources in non-international armed conflicts: Applying international humanitarian law;International Review of the Red Cross;2023-04-26
2. Individual Criminal Responsibility for Autonomous Weapons Systems in International Criminal Law;INT HUMANIT LAW;2023-02-27
3. Introduction;Individual Criminal Responsibility for Autonomous Weapons Systems in International Criminal Law;2023-02-17
4. Punishment;An Introduction to the International Criminal Court;2020-07-02
5. Trial and Appeal;An Introduction to the International Criminal Court;2020-07-02