Thucydides on Aetiology and Methodology and Some Links with the Philosophy of Heraclitus
-
Published:2018-02-20
Issue:2
Volume:71
Page:229-246
-
ISSN:0026-7074
-
Container-title:Mnemosyne
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:MNEM
Affiliation:
1. Università di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Studi UmanisticiUniversità di Trieste, Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici
Abstract
AbstractAn analysis of Thucydides’ most famous statements on the origins of the war between Athens and Sparta (1.23.4-6) and on the methodology of research of the facts (1.22.2. Cf. 1.20-21) shows a philosophical approach to history and historical research. A critically assessed comparison with some of Heraclitus of Ephesus’ statements also suggests that Thucydides’ own knowledge of early ancient philosophy helped him to shape his view on fundamental issues of historical research.Thucydides appears to have introduced himself in a similar way as one might expect a philosopher would have done. Besides the rhetoric of self-presentation and self-definition, Thucydides was indeed a philosopher: he conceived his own political science as a hidden sophia which showed the invisible forces that, by reciprocal interaction, shaped historical development.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,History,Language and Linguistics,Archeology,Classics
Reference46 articles.
1. Thucydides on the Causes of the War;Andrewes;CQ,1959
2. Historical Necessity and Contingency;Ben-Menahem,2009
3. The New Genre and Its Boundaries. Poets and Logographers;Corcella,2006
4. How not to Conceive Heraclitean Harmony;Dilcher,2013
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献