Affiliation:
1. The Amsterdam Centre of Ancient Studies and Archaeology, University of Amsterdam
Abstract
This article evaluates the results of prior research on anaphoric reference in Latin, and tries to account for the various observations within a single explanatory framework. This framework combines insights from cognitive linguistic theory and from ongoing empirical research on the linguistic marking of discourse organization in Latin. After a brief discussion of recent cognitive linguistic views on the relation between deixis and anaphora, I concentrate on the various uses of the Latin demonstrativehicin Virgil’sAeneid. The examples discussed show thathic’s deictic aspect of proximity can be discerned in all its uses, the variety of which can best be described in terms of a ‘cline’, running from canonical deixis to canonical anaphora. It is argued that in its anaphoric use, Latinhicbehaves as a linguistic ‘anchoring’ device, and is used as part of a communicative strategy referred to as‘reculer pour mieux sauter’.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,History,Language and Linguistics,Archeology,Classics
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献