Abstract
AbstractThis paper examines the discrepancy between the attitudes of many historians of mathematics to sixteenth-century geometry and those of museum curators and others interested in practical mathematics and in instruments. It argues for the need to treat past mathematical practice, not in relation to timeless criteria of mathematical worth, but according to the agenda of the period. Three examples of geometrical activity (cartography, surveying and warfare) are used to illustrate this, and two particular contexts (the wider world of human affairs and the discipline of natural philosophy) are presented in which mathematical practice localised in the sixteenth century takes on a special historical significance.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. On Jungius’ Texturæ Contemplatio;International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées;2023
2. Treating plants as laboratories: A chemical natural history of vegetation in 17th‐century
E
ngland;Centaurus;2020-08
3. Philosophical Algebra;International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées;2020
4. Practical mathematicians and mathematical practice in later seventeenth-century London;The British Journal for the History of Science;2019-06
5. Inside: Out;Grey Room;2015-04