Abstract
AbstractThis paper argues that the construction of natural histories, as advocated by Francis Bacon, played a central role in John Locke's conception of method in natural philosophy. It presents new evidence in support of John Yolton's claim that "the emphasis upon compiling natural histories of bodies ... was the chief aspect of the Royal Society's programme that attracted Locke, and from which we need to understand his science of nature". Locke's exposure to the natural philosophy of Robert Boyle, the medical philosophy of Thomas Sydenham, his interest in travel literature and his conception of the division of the sciences are examined. From this survey, a cumulative case is presented which establishes, independently of an in-depth exegesis of his Essay Concerning Human Understanding, the central role for Locke of the construction of natural histories in natural philosophy.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Petty's instruments: the Down Survey, territorial natural history and the birth of statistics;The British Journal for the History of Science;2024-01-16
2. The Book of Nature and the Books of Man;The Information Revolution in Early Modern Europe;2021-10-31
3. Introduction;The Information Revolution in Early Modern Europe;2021-10-31
4. The Paper of Politics and the Politics of Paper;The Information Revolution in Early Modern Europe;2021-10-31
5. “Ink-Stained Fingers”;The Information Revolution in Early Modern Europe;2021-10-31