Affiliation:
1. Department of International Relations and Development Policy, Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
Abstract
Abstract
International Relations (ir) norm studies have long been stuck to a narrow understanding of the concept of norm entrepreneurship, limiting it to actors from the Global North and their efforts to spread western norms. Building on recent studies that focus on non-western or ‘authoritarian’ norm entrepreneurs, this paper highlights the limitations of academic discourse itself, which seems to be wedded to a particular notion of what ‘ideational commitment’ means and from whom it must emanate. Such a prefabricated understanding risks lauding some forms of norm entrepreneurship as ‘genuine’, while dismissing other cases as strategically motivated. Instead, the paper argues for ‘de-moralising’ the concept. Decoupling it from normative biases does not only reveal the full repertoire of norm entrepreneurial action (from cooperative to confrontational). It also shifts attention to contestation as modus vivendi of norm entrepreneurship, and to the political nature of norm dynamics.
Reference67 articles.
1. Constructing Global Order. Agency and Change in World Politics;Acharya, Amitav.,2018
2. Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World;Acharya, Amitav.,2011
3. Who Are the Norm Makers? The Asian-African Conference in Bandung and the Evolution of Norms;Acharya, Amitav.,2004
4. Global Liberalism versus Political Islam: Competing Ideological Frameworks in International Politics;Adamson, Fiona B.,2005
5. a/60/pv.10. Statement to the 60th Session of the unga;Ahmadinejad, Mahmud.,2005
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献