Affiliation:
1. Professor of International Relations and Public Policy, Department of Political and Cultural Studies, Director of Global Drug Policy Observatory, Swansea University UK
2. Professor of Public International Law, Queen Mary University of London
Abstract
Abstract
The UN based framework for international drug control, described as the global drug prohibition regime, has displayed some capacity to evolve. This is the case both in terms of formal structures and accompanying norms. Recent moves by a small number of jurisdictions towards the legal regulation of cannabis for non-medical and non-scientific purposes has, however, highlighted the existence of systemic inertia in the face of unprecedented challenge. The resultant obstacles and accompanying recourse by states to creative legal argumentation contrasts with approaches found within the regime for environmental regulation and its underpinning Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). In this case a variety of structures and bodies characterise a more dynamic and responsive framework. It is argued here that while we should be alert to issue area specificity, much can be learned from MEAs and their regime evolution, in relation to governance structures and the use of Conferences of the Parties.
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Nexus between International Law and Science;International Community Law Review;2022-04-01
2. The Strange Career of the Transnational Legal Order of Cannabis Prohibition;Transnational Legal Ordering of Criminal Justice;2020-07-02
3. Index;Treaties in Motion;2020-06-25
4. Bibliography;Treaties in Motion;2020-06-25
5. Concluding Remarks;Treaties in Motion;2020-06-25