Affiliation:
1. Dostoyevsky Omsk State University
Abstract
The article examines the individual’s right to information privacy as an opportunity to have a non-public area of life. It is argued that a person, being a vulnerable creature, feels the need for secrecy, closeness and opacity of his or her personality. The right to information privacy does not mean complete concealment of private life, but the possibility of regulating access, when individuals can choose whom, when and to what extent to reveal the details of their lives. This presupposes both a person who feels him or herself to be an autonomous person and a society that respects his or her rights and freedoms. There is a duty of restraint and tact, which prohibits violating someone else’s privacy. As one of the aspects of privacy, in addition to the inviolability of the body and home, the human right to information protection is recognized. The theoretical foundation of the right to privacy is the philosophy of liberalism, which protects the individual from unwanted interference from the state and society. The need for private space has evolved in human history along with the growth of individualism. Currently, the right to information privacy is gaining special relevance in connection with the development of digital technologies that allow collecting, storing and processing large amounts of data. As a result, a person, on the one hand, does not know who, when and for what purpose collects his or her data, and, on the other hand, he or she often voluntarily, in connection with the need for social recognition, leaves information about him or herself on social networks. As a result of such actions, the loss of control over personal information can lead to undesirable consequences.
Publisher
Research Institute for Mechanics of National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Reference21 articles.
1. Arendt, H. Vita activa, ili O deyatelnoy zhizni [The Human Condition]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 2000. (In Russian)
2. Benn, S. “Privacy, freedom and respect for persons”, in: F.D. Schoeman (ed.), Philosophical Dimensions for Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 223–244.
3. Chesnokova, L.V. “Pravo na privatnost v liberalnoy filosofii Novogo vremeni” [Right to privacy in liberal philosophy of the modern era], Gumanitarnyy vektor [Humanitarian Vector], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp 33–42, doi: 10.21209/1996–7853-2020–15-2–33-42. (In Russian)
4. Elias, N. O protsesse tsivilisatsii: Sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya. V 2 tomakh. T. 1. Izneneniya v povedenii vysshego sloya miryan v stranakh Zapada [Civilizing Process. Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. In 2 Vol. Vol. 1. Changes in the Upper Class of the Laity’s Behavior in Western Countries] / transl. from German. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2001.
5. Foucault, M. Intellektualy i vlast: izbrannye politicheskie statji, vystupleniya i intervjyu [Dits et ecrits: articles politiques, conferences, interviews 1970–1984]. Moscow: Praxis Publ., 2002. (In Russian)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献