Abstract
Motivated by a paucity of research into the impact of corporate governance from a debtholder perspective, we examine the impact of corporate governance on loan monitoring decisions. The active and close involvement of a major UK bank facilitated the development of extremely realistic experimental scenarios with a great deal of accurate institutional detail. The results show that the likelihood of loan officers increasing the level of monitoring in the context of a debt covenant breach is associated with board independence, director financial expertise and the presence of a blockholder. A two-way interaction between financial expertise and board independence is also documented. Since likelihood of debt covenant breaches continues to be an important variable in studies of accounting choice and corporate finance the paper provides insights into associated debt contracting costs and their determinants. Apart from extending the academic literature, this study provides additional evidence on the efficacy of good corporate governance in reducing debt contracting costs that should also be of interest to regulators and practitioners
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference61 articles.
1. Agrawal, A. and Chadha,S., 2005. Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals. The Journal of Law & Economics 48, pp 371-406.
2. Al Jifri, K. and Taylor P., 2002. Accounting Manipulation by Managers of Financially Troubled Companies: Issues for Loan Monitoring. Journal of International Banking, Law, 17 (6), pp. 167-173.
3. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H. Collins, D. and LaFond, R., 2006. The Effects of Corporate Governance on Firms’ Credit Ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42, pp 203-243.
4. Asquith, P., Beatty A., Weber, J., 2005. “Performance Pricing in Bank Debt Contracts”. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40, pp 101-128.
5. Anderson, R. Mansi, S. and Reeb, D., 2004. Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and the Cost of Debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37, pp 315-342.