Abstract
This study examines corporate tax avoidance as a determinant of executive compensation on the basis of equity risk incentives. Previous research shows that equity risk incentives motivate managers to make more risky, but positive net present value—investment decisions. Through correlation analyses, this study demonstrates that the tax risk measures adopted in this study are negatively associated with both the adoption of stock options and tax aggressive measures. Through multivariate analyses, this study demonstrates that executive compensations are significantly associated with our measures of tax risk positions despite the inclusion of several control variables. Moreover, this study finds consistent evidence that executive equity risk incentives are significantly associated with aggressive tax positions, regardless of the estimation method and the strength of the corporate governance function, and across several tax risk measures.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference30 articles.
1. Armstrong, C.S., J.L. Blouin, and D.F. Larcker. 2010. “The incentives for tax planning.” Working paper, Stanford University and University of Pennsylvania.
2. Carcello, J., D. Hermanson, T. Neal, and R. Riley, Jr. 2002. ‘‘Board Characteristics and Audit Fees.’’ Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (Fall): 365-384.
3. Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. 2010. “Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?” Journal of Financial Economics 95 (1): 41-61.
4. Cheng, C.S.A., Huang, H.H., Li, Y., and J. Stanfield. 2012.” The Effect of Hedge Fund Activism on Corporate Tax Avoidance”, The Accounting Review 87(5): 1493–1526
5. Cohen, D., A. Dey, and T. Lys. 2007. “The Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002: Implications for compensation contracts and managerial risk-taking.” Working paper, Stern School of Business.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献