Should bankers pay more taxes? Analysing the UK’s bank payroll tax scheme using efficiency and equity lenses

Author:

Kim Jasper1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ewha Womans University

Abstract

This article takes a conceptual, tax policy analytical approach towards the 2009–2010 UK bank payroll tax (BPT) — often referred to as the ‘banker’s bonus tax’ — from the tax policy conceptual frameworks of efficiency and equity. The first conceptual tax policy factor relating to efficiency under optimal tax theory is analysed in terms of Pareto optimality (Mirrlees et al., 2011), which seeks minimal distortions and avoidance of deadweight costs (Auerbach, 2013; Stiglitz 1986). The conceptual tax policy factor relating to equity will be analysed in terms of fairness, with a policy focus geared toward formal incidence (Shavrio 2009). Equity-related tax policy concerns as it relates to the UK bank payroll tax also include both the benefits principle and ability-to-pay principle, whilst incorporating vertical and horizontal equity concerns. This article is composed of two main parts. The first part provides a conceptual tax and policy analysis from the perspective of efficiency. The second part provides a conceptual tax and policy analysis from the perspective of equity and fairness. Throughout each part, the analysis is augmented through the utilisation of various graphical visual examples.

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Management Science and Operations Research,Decision Sciences (miscellaneous),Strategy and Management

Reference26 articles.

1. Andersen, T., & Maibom, J. (2016). The big trade-off between efficiency and equity — Is it there? (CEPF Discussion Paper No. OP11189). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2766484

2. Auerbach, A. (2013). Corporate income taxation, corporate taxation, wealth transfer taxes and consumption tax reforms. Paper presented at The Empirical Foundations of SupplySide Economics Conference. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~auerbach/Capital%20Income%20Taxation.pdf

3. Bankman, J., & Weisbach, D. A. (2006). The superiority of an ideal consumption tax over an ideal income tax. Stanford Law Review 58, Article 1413. http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/04/bankman.pdf

4. Batchelder, L. L. (2020). Optimal tax theory as a theory of distributive justice. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724691

5. Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.77

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3