Affiliation:
1. University “Ukshin Hoti” Prizren
2. University of Prishtina “Hasan Prishtina”
Abstract
The research focuses on the impact of value-added tax (VAT) harmonization as necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the single market. The aim is to show the legal basis and national actions taken by the nations to fulfill the Directives’ requirement for harmonization as a precondition for promoting the single market. This paper also examines Member States’ (MS) ongoing efforts to harmonize national tax systems because of fiscal sovereignty to choose its own VAT structure which prevents complete harmonization and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) interpretation approach to VAT. An example of a harmonized tax inside the European Union (EU) is VAT. The development and effectiveness of a single market is the EU’s top priority. To realize the goal of creating a single market, all barriers to the free movement of people, capital, goods, and services between the MS must be eliminated (Kollmann, 2019). To fulfill the research aims, the histogram methodology and several statistical analyses were utilized to summarize data and hypothesis testing. The findings underline that, from the MS’s viewpoint, the EU VAT is primarily a significant source of revenue. From the viewpoint of the EU, a harmonized VAT should be seen as a fundamental part of the single market. The research is of particular relevance to researchers, tax practitioners, VAT policy designers, etc. The VAT harmonization process and challenges in the EU are an excellent platform for analyzing the views of science, doctrine, and practice on this issue. This research will enable further research into the strategy and challenges of VAT harmonization.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Management Science and Operations Research,Decision Sciences (miscellaneous),Strategy and Management
Reference57 articles.
1. Abramova, A., Shaposhnykov, K., Zhavoronok, Z., Liutikov, P., Skvirskyi, I., & Lukashev, O. (2021). The ecosystem of VAT administration in e-commerce: Case of the Eastern Europe countries. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.4909
2. Bengoetxea, J., Maccormick, N., & Moral Soriano, L. (2001). Integration and integrity in the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice. In G. De Burca & J. H. H. Weiler (Eds.), The European Court of Justice (pp. 43–85). Oxford University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/2912
3. Binder, E. (2021). VAT gap, reduced VAT rates and their impact on compliance costs for businesses and on consumers. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/694215/EPRS_STU(2021)694215_EN.pdf
4. Birkenfeld, W. (2003). Mehrwertsteuer der EU: Die 6., 8., und 13. USt-Richtlinie mit Erläuterungen. Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co.
5. Bray, S. (2022, April 19). Benefits of principled tax policy: EU VAT reform results. Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/eu-vat-reform-eu-own-resources/