Affiliation:
1. Iqra University
2. Higher Colleges of Technology
3. Apeejay School of Management
Abstract
This research aims to test the relationship between dimensions of paternalistic leadership and dimensions of organizational commitment in the information technology (IT) sector of Istanbul. Two separate questionnaires were adapted for measuring dimensions of paternalistic leadership (Erben & Güneşer, 2008) and organizational commitment (Allen & Meyer, 1990). Data were collected at two different points in time from such employees of the IT sector of Istanbul who have been working with the same manager for at least six months. In all, 350 pairs of questionnaires were distributed and only 248 pairs of questionnaires were received. Three separate multiple regression analyses were used as the statistical technique. Results indicated that two of the dimensions of paternalistic leadership, namely benevolent leadership and moral leadership, have a significant relationship with the three dimensions of organizational commitment, namely affective, normative, and continuance commitment. However, authoritarian leadership is found to be negatively associated with affective commitment, whereas, it does not have any significant association with normative and continuance commitment. Therefore, it is concluded that benevolent leadership and moral leadership can be instrumental in enhancing the level of organizational commitment among the employees, whereas, authoritarianism can be counterproductive in nature. Hence, the study provides the framework to the managers in the IT sector of Istanbul for enhancing the organizational commitment among the employees.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Management Science and Operations Research,Decision Sciences (miscellaneous),Strategy and Management
Reference40 articles.
1. Abbas, M., Habib, H., & Siddique, A. (2020). Impact of paternalistic leadership on turnover intention: Evidence from the Islamic banking industry of Karachi, Pakistan. RADS Journal of Business Management, 2(2), 167–176. https://jbm.juw.edu.pk/index.php/jbm/article/view/38/31
2. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
3. Batırlık, S. N., Gencer, Y. G., & Akkucuk, U. (2022). Global virtual team leadership scale (GVTLS) development in multinational companies. Sustainability, 14(2), Article 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14021038
4. Carnevale, J. B., Huang, L., & Paterson, T. (2019). LMX-differentiation strengthens the prosocial consequences of leader humility: An identification and social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 96, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.048
5. Chai, D. S., Jeong, S., & Joo, B. K. (2020). The multi-level effects of developmental opportunities, pay equity, and paternalistic leadership on organizational commitment. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(4/5), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-09-2019-0163