Impact of manager’s motivation on fraudulent accounting: An empirical study

Author:

Alakkas Abdullah Abdurhman1ORCID,Alhumoudi Hamad1ORCID,Khan Hina2ORCID,Imam Ashraf3ORCID,Khatoon Asma2ORCID,Bashir Samina2ORCID,Khan Imran Ahmad4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saudi Electronic University, Saudi Arabia

2. Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia

3. Al-Fayha College, Saudi Arabia

4. S.K. College of Business, India

Abstract

This study empirically examines the motives of Indian firms’ managers to violate Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and engage in so-called fraudulent accounting. Managers’ motivations for fraudulent accounting rather than profit adjustment are empirically analyzed using data from Indian-listed companies. The sample includes 91 firms and the period of study is March 2001 to March 2022. The tests were conducted using single and multiple variables by the empirical methods used in other studies on profit adjustment. In the case of single variables, the tests are the chi-square test of independence for dummy variables and the significance test of the difference between the mean and median for continuous variables. In the case of multiple variables, the sample firms with a dependent variable of 1 and the control firms with a dependent variable of 0 are analyzed using the logit model. The estimation is done by the robust covariance method. The findings indicate that firms that engage in fraudulent accounting are significantly worse off than other firms in terms of their financial position and operating results, have significantly higher financing needs, and significantly more frequently conduct initial public offerings (IPOs).

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Reference36 articles.

1. Abdulhussein, A. S., Al-Refiay, H. A. N., & Wahhab, A. M. A. (2023). The impact of internal auditing on corruption: Evidence from the emerging market [Special issue]. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(1), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i1siart15

2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2000). The panel on audit effectiveness report and recommendations (SEC Practice Section). https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_assoc/270

3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit (Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99). https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_sas/101

4. Beasley, M. S., Hermanson, D. R., Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting: 1998–2007. An analysis of U.S. public companies. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_assoc/453

5. Camfferman, K., & Wielhouwer, J. L. (2019). 21st century scandals: Towards a risk approach to financial reporting scandals. Accounting and Business Research, 49(5), 503–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1614267

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3