Affiliation:
1. Modern Management Centre, Shanghai, China
2. Institute of Public Management, China
Abstract
This is a conceptual paper, supporting due diligence (DD) in reframing organisational leadership through an investment approach to human capital and mindset. The aim — to enhance relations between organisations, their multistakeholders, and ecosystems. Ambiculturalism and Ti-Yong (体用) underpin the proposed frames. Western and Chinese organisations, provide an example. An investment perspective, as distinct from a cost to operations approach, is presented through two frames, as core elements reflecting a human capital investment (HCI)–leadership investment mindset (LIM) focus. The frames are supported by Tao (道) philosophy, through the Yin-Yang & five elements — 阴阳五行 — expressed as Ti-Yong (Lao-tzu, 1998; Cheng & Bunnin, 2002). A Western theory, dualities (Evans, 1999), is also employed. Seven (7) propositions provide direction for assessing the efficacy of the proposed frames. Data has not been collected, hence methodology is presented via what may be undertaken, to test the efficacy of two complex frames. A combination of multivariate techniques, including PCA, CFA, SEM (LISREL), and/or partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) is recommended. Ringle, Sarstedt, Mitchell, and Gudergan (2020) propose PLS-SEM for HRM issues to address issues tied to, model complexity, estimating constructs, and deriving latent variable scores. The relevance of the proposed frames goes to enhancing organisational leadership thinking and subsequent organisational leadership behaviour, through a DD process. Professional practice applications are addressed
Reference71 articles.
1. Biermeier-Hanson, B., Lui, M., & Dickson, M. W. (2015). Alternative views of global leadership: Applying global leadership perspectives to leading global teams. In J. L. Wildman, & R. L. Griffith (Eds.), Leading global teams (pp. 195–223). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2050-1_9
2. Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM — Firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159029
3. Buchanan, A., & Kern, M. L. (2017). The benefit of mindset: The psychology of contribution and everyday leadership. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i1.538
4. Butler, C. L., Zander, L., Mockaitis, A., & Sutton, C. (2012). The global leader as boundary spanner, bridge maker, and blender. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01439.x
5. Byrne, B. M. (1995). One application of structural equation modeling from two perspectives: Exploring the EQS and LISREL strategies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 138–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献