Quality of legislative process during the time of the pandemic

Author:

Chandranegara Ibnu Sina1ORCID,Cahyawati Dwi Putri2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta,Indonesia

2. University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

Due to opaque and hurried deliberation during the COVID-19 incident, Indonesia’s legal system has been low-quality. Matched to Rishan’s (2022) and Chandranegara and Cahyawati’s (2023) reports, there has been a decline in the quality of the legislative process due to the conflict of interest of the lawmakers. During the COVID-19 pandemic, laws are frequently created with little input and strict respect for procedural rules. This paper intends to answer two research questions, first, how and why the market’s power is interested in controlling the legal system, and second, what scenario would minimize and prevent the consequences of the influence. This study uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. The study demonstrates that realizing the fulfilment of economic objectives can be achieved through the legislative process. As a result, the legislative process may lose its purpose. It is possible to hold this hostage starting with corrupt activities like bribery or political donations, which are typically linked to corruption, as well as a model of cognitive bias since lawmakers are subtly connected to corporate interests. As a result, lawmakers must stop business actors from having conflicts of interest.

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics

Reference67 articles.

1. Al'afghani, M. M., & Bisariyadi, B. (2021). Konsep regulasi berbasis risiko: Telaah kritis dalam penerapannya pada undang-undang cipta kerja. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 66-90. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1814

2. Alvarez, S. (2011). Constitutional conflicts, moral dilemmas, and legal solutions. Ratio Juris, 24(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00474.x

3. Anton, A., Fisk, M., & Holmstrom, N. (2001). Not for sale: In defense of public goods. Routledge.

4. Arter, D. (2006). Introduction: Comparing the legislative performance of legislatures. Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(3-4), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600875423

5. Asshiddiqie, J. (1994). Gagasan kedaulatan rakyat dalam konstitusi dan pelaksanaannya di Indonesia: Pergeseran keseimbangan antara individualisme dan kolektivisme dalam kebijakan demokrasi politik dan demokrasi ekonomi selama tiga masa demokrasi, 1945-1980-an. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3