Abstract
The understanding of the board of a corporation and its behavior is limited, despite the board’s societal importance. We present a contingency approach to the board’s functional emphasis, considering a fourth function in addition to monitoring, decision making, and service or resource provision. The additional function is conflict resolution (or principal identification). The approach contrasts with mainstream research by assuming that the firm is a nexus of investments, avoiding the empirical assumption that the shareholder is the sole principal. We derive propositions that are not restricted to any empirical category of a corporation, and address praxis implications for managing functional disharmony.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference68 articles.
1. Anderson, R. C. and Reeb, D. M. Reeb (2004) Board Composition: Balancing Family Influence in S&P 500 Firms Source, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 209-237.
2. Aguilera, R. V. and Jackson, G. (2003) The crossnational diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants, Academy of Management Review, 28, 447-465.
3. Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R. E. (1990) The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy, Academy of Management Review, 15, 72-87.
4. Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D. and Turk, T. (1991) Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy, Academy of Management Journal.
5. Berle, Jr., A. A. and Means, G. C. [1932] (1947) The modern corporation and private property, New York: MacMillan.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献