Abstract
Data by EU Commission show a low representation of women on boards. The scope of this article is to read contemporary and according to a managerial approach the possible causes of this situation: the availability of skills possessed by women to cover top positions, the presence of binding or self-regulatory rules and the corporate culture towards CSR approach. Our research is focused on EU countries, where the gender equality on board is currently matter of attention and regulatory interventions. We conclude that the scarce presence of women in the boardrooms is not ascribable to a scarcity of expertise, but it is associated with a social background and a corporate culture not inspired by corporate global responsibility values. Regulatory interventions may accelerate the consciousness of gender balance on boards, but without companies’ commitment in CSR matters and without a clear vision of corporate global responsibility (including economic, social and environmental aspects), they tend to become additional tasks in the management of corporate compliance risk.
Subject
Business and International Management
Reference36 articles.
1. Andrews, K.R. (1980) The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Homewood, Irwin.
2. Ansoff, H.I. (1983) ‘Societal strategy for the business firm’ Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 1, pp.3-29.
3. Atakan, S.M.G., Burnaz, S. and Topcu I.I. (2008) ‘An Empirical Investigation of the Ethical Perceptions of Future Managers with a Special Emphasis on Gender – Turkish Case’, Gender Issues - Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp.573-586.
4. Bansal, P. (2005) ‘Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 197–218.
5. Bernardi, R.A. and Threadgill, V.H. (2010) ‘Women Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies, Vol. 15, No.2, pp. 15-21.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献