Abstract
Using 3,057 observations from 2000 to 2012, we found the risk of expropriation of minority shareholders by controlling shareholders is positively associated with participation of institutional investors in equity funding. There is no evidence that these investors increase the likelihood of substituting the chief executive officer or increase the company’s value or its financial performance. However, the presence of institutional investors is associated with higher company debt. This study suggests that institutional investors assume a function not fully explained by agency theory, such as enabling greater access to debt markets, but accentuate the agency conflict between controlling and minority shareholders. The main results show that the presence of institutional investors mitigates agency conflicts between shareholders and creditors, but increases the risk of expropriation of minority shareholders.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference30 articles.
1. Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, F., and Matos, P. (2011), “Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 154–181.
2. Amaral, H.F., Iquiapaza, R.A., Tomaz, W.P., and Bertucci, L.A. (2008), “Governança corporativa e divulgação de relatórios financeiros anuais (Corporate governance and release of annual financial statements)”, Contabilidade Vista & Revista, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 61–82.
3. Black, B.S., Carvalho, A.G., and Sampaio, O.J. (2014), “The evolution of corporate governance in Brazil”, Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 20, pp. 176–195.
4. BM&FBovespa. (2014), “Comparative list of segments”. available at: , accessed September 22, 2014.
5. Chung, K. and Zhang, H. (2011), “Corporate governance and institutional ownership”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 247–273.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献