Abstract
In this study we show that family owners of public corporations have greater incentive to preserve the continuity of the firms during financial crisis relative to short-term oriented parties in widely held public corporations. In this regard, we show that during financial crisis family firms report higher performance, experience more financial support from their shareholders, report lower investment cuts, greater level of cash and have lower leverage ratios, relative to non-family firms. These findings are in line with predictions of socioemotional wealth, because show that family owners have greater incentive to retain control over the firm and to preserve the continuity of their firms during financial crisis relative to short-term oriented parties.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference53 articles.
1. Ali, A., Chen, T. Y., and Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44: 238-86.
2. Anderson, R. C., and Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding Family Ownership and Firms Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58: 1301-1328.
3. Barrios, J. M., & Macciocchi, D. (2013). CEO Turnover, Earnings Management, & Family Control. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=2268214
4. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3): 258-279.
5. Brigham, K.H., Lumpkin, G.T., Payne, G.T., and Zachary, M.A. (2014) Researching Long-Term Orientation: A Validation Study and Recommendations for Future Research. Family Business Review, 27(1): 72-88.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献