Prospects of governance 4.0: Moving beyond directors’ networks to the networked board

Author:

Blomson Dean1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Technology Sydney

Abstract

The problem that this paper addresses is growing evidence that conventional board models (especially the unitary board version) are approaching their use-by-date and may no longer be fit-for-purpose. This paper follows the published research by Ernst & Young (EY, 2021) with Dean Blomson as the lead researcher on board operating models of the future. One model was the ‘networked board operating model’; but its operation was not outlined in any detail. This conceptual paper examines the relevance, contribution, role and operation of a networked board. Methodologically, it draws on existing governance and networks’ literature and extrapolates that abductively to consider the applicability of a networked board/governance model. This paper outlines the design logic, construct, features and possible operation of such a model; and the key conditions for its success. The conclusion is that a networked board (governance) model for an enterprise (as opposed to multiple enterprises): 1) has interesting, relevant features worthy of consideration and adoption; 2) is not simply an abstract, theoretical construct but could be pragmatically applied and ‘operated’; and, therefore, 3) should have a place as an ‘alternative’ governance model (recognising that what is unconventional today may be mainstream tomorrow). The relevance of this paper is that it provides a foundation for further contemplation and critique of the model — as a viable alternative governance construct that is likely to be far more responsive to the vagaries of a VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous) world, where ‘always on’ vigilance and heightened stakeholder engagement will be governance imperatives, for growing numbers of enterprises.

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference41 articles.

1. Acaroglu, L. (2017, September 7). Tools for systems thinkers: The 6 fundamental concepts of systems thinking. Medium. https://medium.com/disruptive-design/tools-for-systems-thinkers-the-6-fundamental-concepts-of-systems-thinking-379cdac3dc6a

2. Aguiar, M., Azevedo, D., & Orglmeiste, C. (2012, December 12). Value-focused corporate governance: How to engage boards and enhance decision making. Boston Consulting Group (BCG). https://www.bcg.com/en-au/publications/2012/leadership-strategic-planning-value-focused-corporate-governance

3. Allison, S. (2014, February 10). The responsive organization: Coping with new technology and disruption. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottallison/2014/02/10/the-responsive-organization-how-to-cope-with-technology-and-disruption/?sh=29f457943cdd

4. Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). (2019). Corporate governance principles and recommendations (4th ed.). https://www.asx.com.au/documents/asx-compliance/cgc-principles-and-recommendations-fourth-edn.pdf

5. Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp121

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3