Abstract
Today there are about thirty authorities supervising national financial markets and institutions in the EU-15 countries. The member States have chosen different models for supervising their financial systems. We describe the three main theoretical supervisory models proposed in the literature: vertical, horizontal, centralised. In practice, however, it is difficult to find a pure application of these models, while the actual supervisory systems are the result of the different legal frameworks of the member States and of the way in which their financial systems developed. Moreover, although the Lamfalussy Report can be considered an important step towards a more integrated financial supervisory system at the European level, the supervisory arrangements are still very different among member States. This work provides an analysis of the different systems of financial supervision in Europe: showing how the differences that still exist among their systems make it more difficult to achieve a real European integration in financial supervision
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference9 articles.
1. Cervellati, E.M. (2003) Financial Regulation and Supervision in EU Countries, paper presented at the 2003 EFMA Annual Meeting, Helsinky, 25-29 June 2003.
2. Di Giorgio, G. and Di Noia, C. (2005) Towards a New Architecture for Financial Regulation and Supervision in Europe, Journal of Financial Trasformation, Vol. 14, pp. 145-156.
3. Di Giorgio, G. and Di Noia, C. (2001) Financial Regulation and Supervision in the euro Area: A Four-Peak Proposal, Financial Institutions Center, The Wharton School.
4. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (2005) How Countries Supervise their Banks, Insurers and Securities Markets, Central Banking Publications.
5. Goodhart C. A. E. (1988) The costs of regulation, in Seldon A., Financial Regulation or Over-Regulation, Institute of Economic Affairs, London (1988).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献