Affiliation:
1. Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
Abstract
This study addresses the economic significance of public spaces in the Philippines and aims to contribute to the development of a comprehensive urban management plan. Motivated by a recognized deficiency in strategic planning for public areas, the study investigates economic activities, assesses their impact on the local economy, businesses, and tourism, and proposes sustainable urban development solutions. Participants from diverse industries provided data through surveys and interviews, employing a mixed-methods approach. Findings reveal the underutilization of public spaces despite their substantial contributions. The study proposes holistic urban management solutions, including physical design improvements, support for informal enterprises, tourism promotion, and community engagement. This research underscores the importance of addressing strategic planning gaps for sustainable urban development. The abstract succinctly captures the research problem, purpose, methodology, main findings, and conclusion, offering valuable insights into the economic potential of public spaces and their relevance to urban management planning in the Philippines.
Reference30 articles.
1. Armas, K. L., & Moralde, R. R. (2023). Development of a comprehensive economic enterprise development program in the Philippines. Asian Development Policy Review, 11(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.55493/5008.v11i2.4755
2. Astuti, P. D., Datrini, L. K., & Chariri, A. (2023). An empirical investigation of the relationship between green intellectual capital and corporate sustainable development. Corporate & Business Strategy Review, 4(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv4i2art5
3. Bellu, E., Issini, G., Pugnaloni, F., & Srisuwan, C. (2010). Enhancing urban quality through natural architecture and cooperative design: The case of Chiang Mai, Thailand. In Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region, J. Al-Qawasmi, H. Al Waer, & S. Lehmann (Eds.), Sustainable architecture and urban development, (Vol. 1, pp. 313–329). CSAAR Press. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB22614.pdf
4. Bromley, R. (2000). Street vending and public policy: A global review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(1/2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330010789052
5. Brueckner, J. K., Thisse, J.-F., & Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor?: An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review, 43(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00019-1