Abstract
The social impact bond (SIB), at the present in Italy, is a financial instrument issued by a bank to support social initiatives in which the subscriber will receive a limited financial return on investment. As part of that performance, the social return for the community is considered as an integration of the financial performance that will replace a part of the interest rate. The first experience in Italy is represented by a bank that has issued 45 Social Bond for 472 million euros. The research analyses, on the basis of the character-ristics of the third sector in Italy, with particular reference to the financial weakness of the sector, the possible impact on the financial management process in the social enterprises by the use of SIB. Moreover, we would demonstrate that, with a well-conducted cost-benefit analysis, it is possible to construct a hypothesis of SIB in which the repayment is based on market rate. In particular, is proposed the development of a SIB with the objective of formulating hypotheses of response to the innovative following questions: Given certain cost drivers, what social outcomes would generate savings for the state budget able to fully repay the fixed costs of the SIB, to give a percentage of the benefit to the government and to ensure the repayment to investors? How to identify the timing of cash flows in order to structure a potential internal rate of return objective satisfactory for investors? Due to the lack of already developed case studies, with the technics of the business plan, we analyse the impact of SIB on social and financial performance, both from the point of view of the Public Administration and of the social enterprise, in a project of social housing introducing a remuneration rate at market level. The development of the project shows that, with the integration of the private and public perspective, it is possible to improve the social and financial performance offering an adequate interest rate and, moreover, without limit the hypothesis of SIB underwriting to the philanthropic institution.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference35 articles.
1. Agliata, F., Ferrone C., & Tuccillo, D. (2014). The role of financial instruments on the growth of Italian social cooperatives. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 6, 19-33.
2. Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup045
3. Arru, B., & Ruggieri, M. (2016). I benefici della coporate social responsibility nella creazione di valore sostenibile: Ruolo delle risorse di competenza e del capital relazionale. Rivista di Economia Aziendale Online, 7(1), 17-41.
4. Belinsky, M., Eddy, M., Lohmann, J., & Michael, G. (2014). The application of social impact bonds to universal health-care initiatives in South-East Asia. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health, 3(3-4), 219-225.
5. Ben Soltane, B. (2012). Social and financial performance of microfinance institutions: Is there a trade off? Journal of Economics and International Finance, 4(4), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.5897/JEIF11.129