A research agenda on de-biasing the board

Author:

Água Pedro B.ORCID,Correia AnacletoORCID

Abstract

Boards of directors have the duty to make sound decisions in order to govern the firms they are responsible for. A considerable amount of board misleading during decision-making has mind biases as their root causes. The last decades witnessed plenty of disastrous governance decisions which could be avoided, had some cognitive bias been prevented. Because board directors engage in strategic decisions, the potential negative effects of such biases are of utmost importance, as shown through countless examples. The identification and awareness of such mind traps constitute the first layer of protection, however, is not enough. Some frameworks and tools are in need to address such decision-making traps, in order to avoid organizational mis-performance or even disaster. Measures are needed to counter the decision bias, or even neutralise them, at the board level. Being the need for measures to minimise or neutralize the negative impacts of mind biases obvious, this research is focused on identifying solutions and understanding how such solutions can be implemented in practice

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3