Abstract
The core technology of Bitcoin, the blockchain, has recently emerged as a disruptive innovation with a wide range of applications, potentially able to redesign our interactions in business, politics and society at large. Although scholarly interest in this subject is growing, a comprehensive analysis of blockchain applications from a political perspective is severely lacking to date. This paper aims to fill this gap and it discusses the key points of blockchain-based decentralized governance, which challenges to varying degrees the traditional mechanisms of State authority, citizenship and democracy. In particular, the paper verifies to which extent blockchain and decentralized platforms can be considered as hyper-political tools, capable to manage social interactions on large scale and dismiss traditional central authorities. The analysis highlights risks related to a dominant position of private powers in distributed ecosystems, which may lead to a general disempowerment of citizens and to the emergence of a stateless global society. While technological utopians urge the demise of any centralized institution, this paper advocates the role of the State as a necessary central point of coordination in society, showing that decentralization through algorithm-based consensus is an organizational theory, not a stand-alone political theory.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference79 articles.
1. Abbott, F. (2000). Distributed Governance at the WTO-WIPO: An Evolving Model For Open-Architecture Integrated Governance. Journal of International Economic Law, 3(1), 63-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiel/3.1.63.
2. Allenby, B.R. (2012). The Theory and Practice of Sustainable Engineering (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
3. Almeida, V., Getschko, D., & Afonso, C. (2015). The Origin and Evolution of Multistakeholder Models. IEEE Internet Computing, 19(1), 74-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mic.2015.15.
4. Antonopoulos, A. (2014). Bitcoin Security Model: Trust by Computation. O'Reilly- Radar. Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2014/02/bitcoin-security-model-trust-by-computation.html.
5. Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research And Theory, 18(4), 543-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum0 32.
Cited by
121 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献