Abstract
We investigate those features of Australian firms that make them likely takeover targets. To this end, we apply a logit probability model similar to the one developed by Palepu (1986). Our findings reveal that takeovers are most likely to be motivated by market under-valuation combined with high levels of tangible assets. Takeover targets may also be financially distressed with high levels of leverage and low liquidity, and may exhibit declining sales growth with decreasing profitability. Notwithstanding these insights, we find that the prediction models are unable to provide abnormal returns with a high statistical significance, thereby lending support to market efficiency.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference41 articles.
1. Ambrose, B. W. & Megginson, W. L. 1992. The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition Likelihood. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 27(4), pp. 575-589.
2. Anderson, D., Haynes, A. & Heaney, R. 1994. Company takeovers and equity returns: The target size effect. Australian Journal of Management, vol. 19, pp. 1–29.
3. Barber, B. & Lyon, J. 1997. Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: the empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 43, pp. 341-372.
4. Barnes, P. 1999. Predicting UK takeover targets: some methodological issues and an empirical study. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 12, pp. 283-301.
5. Bishop, S., Dodd, P. & Officer, R. R. 1987. Australian Takeovers: The Evidence. The Centre for Independent Studies, St. Leonards, N.S.W.