Affiliation:
1. Hanoi University of Industry, Vietnam
2. National Economics University, Vietnam
3. Thuongmai University, Vietnam
4. Fordham University, USA
5. PricewaterhouseCoopers Vietnam, Vietnam
Abstract
Internal audit has become an essential part of firms in the age of Industry 4.0 due to its ability to identify errors or violations leading to fraud in firms (Alzeban & Gwilliam, 2014; Cohen & Sayag, 2010). This study is conducted to investigate the relationship between variables such as the quality of internal audit, the capability of the internal audit team, the independence of internal audit, and the support of leadership on the effectiveness of internal audit (EIA). Specifically, the study also examines the relationship between the EIA and the responsibility of auditors in detecting fraud. Data were gathered through a survey of 325 questionnaires from joint stock firms in the context of Vietnam, using SPSS 22 software and SmartPLS 3.0 software to analyze the regression of influencing determinants. The results reveal that: 1) the quality of the internal audit, the capability of the internal audit team, the independence of the internal audit, and the support of leadership have an impact on the internal audit effectiveness; 2) the EIA, the responsibility of auditors, and auditor training have a positive and significant impact on fraud detection. Therefore, the importance of internal audit in identifying accounting fraud and the need for firms to design internal audit processes and training to improve the effectiveness of their operations are highlighted.
Reference44 articles.
1. Al-Twaijry, A. A. M., Brierley, J. A., & Gwilliam, D. R. (2003). The development of internal audit in Saudi Arabia: An institutional theory perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14(5), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00158-2
2. Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.06.001
3. Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2009). Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, 13(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00392.x
4. Balaciu, D. E., Bogdana, V., Feleaga, L., & Popa, A.-L. (2014). “Colorful” approach regarding creative accounting. An introspective study based on the association technique. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 13(4), 643–664. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291698124_Colorful_approach_regarding_creative_accounting_An_introspective_study_based_on_the_association_technique
5. Barac, K., & van Staden, M. (2010). The correlation between perceived internal audit quality and defined corporate governance soundness. Global Journal of Business Management, 4(8), 1–13. https://www.globalscienceresearchjournals.org/articles/the-correlation-between-perceived-internal-audit-quality-and-defined-corporate-governance-soundness.pdf