Affiliation:
1. Tadulako University, Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to develop a fraud disclosure model for corruption cases in the local government environment in Sulawesi through forensic accounting and investigative audits with internal auditor skepticism as moderating. Forensic accounting and investigative auditing are a series of relationships in the examination of fraud. Fraud becomes the main object that is fought in forensic accounting and is proven in investigative audits. This research was conducted by distributing questionnaires to all auditors at Finance and Development Supervisory Agency or Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP), Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia or Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), and internal auditors at Social Security Agency or Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan (BPJS Kesehatan) throughout Indonesia. The number of respondents whose opinions can be used for this study amounted to 118 questionnaires. The results showed that forensic accounting can reduce the level of disclosure of fraud. The results of other research studies also show that good investigative audit practices by auditors can reduce the level of fraud disclosure. Auditor skepticism in auditing practices can strengthen the forensic accounting relationship which results in a reduced level of fraud disclosure and investigative audit relationships which results in a reduced level of fraud disclosure.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference42 articles.
1. Abdullah, M. I., Furqan, A. C., Yamin, N. Y., & Oktora, F. E. (2020). Incentive function of audit opinion for the increase of regional operational expenditure and own-source revenues through sensitivity analysis in Indonesia. Research in World Economy, 11(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v11n1p20
2. Achsin, M. (2010). Visum akuntansi forensik dalam tindak pidana korupsi (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya). Retrieved from http://digilibfeb.ub.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=36645
3. Aksoy, T., & Uzay, S. (2021). Relationship between fraud auditing and forensic accounting. In T. Aksoy & U. Hacioglu (Eds.), Auditing ecosystem and strategic accounting in the digital era (Contributions to Finance and Accounting, pp. 127–146). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72628-7_6
4. Alissa, W., Capkun, V., Jeanjean, T., & Suca, N. (2014). An empirical investigation of the impact of audit and auditor characteristics on auditor performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(7), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.06.003
5. Bastian, I. (2003). Audit sektor publik (1st ed.). Jakarta, Indonesia: Visi Global Media.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献