Affiliation:
1. Aligarh Muslim University
2. MVN University
Abstract
Outcome-based policy evaluation is an established practice in the distributive and redistributive public policies. Such practices are not evident for competitive regulatory policies of telecom, especially in India. This study bridges this research gap by carrying out an outcome-based evaluation of telecom policy and highlighting the importance of such evaluation. Using the methodological pluralism model from Schalock (2002), the outcome of India’s telecom policies was evaluated. Outcome measures from the vision statement of telecom policy were appraised by telecom users by responding to a structured questionnaire-based survey. Factor analysis confirmed that our survey instrument measured the identified policy outcomes. Regression analysis confirmed that users’ appraisal was based on their experiences of telecom services. Against five policy outcome measures, the survey respondents agreed on the achievement of affordability of services: 68.9% of the respondents found telecom services not secure; 74.7% of the survey respondents indicated an issue with quality; 55.6% of the respondents did not agree that the services are available anytime, anywhere. Outcome measures like telephone density (teledensity) as adopted by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and Department of Telecommunications (DoT) are not the true representative of policy outcome. A multistakeholder policy evaluation will reveal the actual policy outcomes. International Telecommunications Union (ITU) should establish a standardized framework for outcome-based policy evaluation to address such issues.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference69 articles.
1. 53% citizens facing severe call connect and call disruption issues. (2019). LocalCircles. Retrieved from https://www.localcircles.com/a/press/page/operators-network-problem#.YTxo76DhWNt).
2. Abreu, M. (2012). Good practices in the selection and use of outcome indicator (Report). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/doc/performance/abreu.pdf
3. Adam, A. M. (2020). Sample size determination in survey research. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 26(5), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2020/v26i530263
4. Al-Shehri, S. M., Loskot, P., Numanoglu, T., & Mert, M. (2017). Common metrics for analyzing, developing and managing telecommunication networks. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03290
5. Alzoubi, H., Alshuridehb, M., Kurdi, B. A., & Inairat, M. (2020). Do perceived service value, quality, price fairness and service recovery shape customer satisfaction and delight? A practical study in the service telecommunication context. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(2020), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2020.2.005