Abstract
The attempt to align interests of executives with those of shareholders has been addressed in the corporate governance context from a predominantly economic outlook based on the agency theory. The models that combine monitoring and control systems in association with financial incentive mechanisms, such as profit and income sharing, stock options, bonds and other benefits, consider an individual to be individualist, opportunist and self-interested, diverging from the assumptions of other theories and contemporary ideas in the area of human resources management. Based on the criticism related to the agency theory, particularly when drawing up incentive schemes, this article aims to look at alternative theories to build corporate governance practices that include considerations on extrinsic and intrinsic motivation of agents.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference32 articles.
1. Aguilera, R.V.& Jackson, G.. (2003). The crossnational diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447-465
2. Albanese, R., Dacin, M.T. & HARRIS, I. C. (1997). Agents as Stewards. The Academy of Management Review, 32: 609-611
3. Arrow, K.J. (1995). The economics of agency. In Pratt, J.W. & Zeckhauser, R.J. Principals and agents: the structure of business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press 37-51
4. Arthurs, J.D. & Busenitz, L.W. (2003). The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28: 145-162
5. Bacharach, S.B. (1989). Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Academy of management review, 15: 496-515
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献