Abstract
The perspective of Evolutionary Governance that I have developed since 2012 is part of the emerging evolutionary perspective on the economy. I have proposed a new vision of governance as the function that optimizes the cognitive and behavioral collective intelligence of a firm to make decisions facing risks and uncertainty. The Board of Directors acts to anticipate variations of external conditions and internal routines, select the right orientations (decisions and routines which ensure the sustainability of the firm) and enhance co-evolution. The term "evolutionary" refers to the process of endogenously developing variations, selection and retention on the one hand, and on the co-evolution phenomenon on the other hand. Once limited to paleoanthropology, it has been extended as an abstract process to conceptualize many domains, among which economics. The original process of variation/selection/retention has become a generic concept of evolution as novelty/emergence/dissemination. Why is it necessary to introduce evolutionary concepts into governance research? To answer this question, I review in the first part the succession of influences over governance theories, and the pitfalls of the current framing compared to the objectives I assign to governance, as an internal mechanism of organizations to structure itself to face risks and uncertainty. In the second part, I review the breakthroughs of evolutionary concepts in various domains in close links with governance: strategy and political science and public administration. And in the last part, I explore the interesting properties of evolutionary governance and overview the impacts of this theory over strategy and economics
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference32 articles.
1. Adolf A. Berle, J.R. & Gardiner C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property 1932.
2. Ansoff, Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals, California Management Review, n°18, P21- 33, 1975.
3. Argyris, Double Loop Learning in Organizations, Harvard Business Review, vol.55, N°5, p115-125, 1977 Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
4. Bernard Grofman, Carole Uhlaner, Metapreferences and the Reasons for Stability in Social Choice : Thoughts on Broadening and Clarifying the Debate, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Theory and Decision 19 (1985) 31-50 0040-5833/85.10.
5. Code de Commerce art L225-35 modified by the lawn°2003-706 August 1, 2003 : The Board of Directors determines the orientations of the activities of the company and monitors their implementation.