The Italian two-tiers model. Evidence and comparison with some other countries

Author:

Provasi RobertaORCID,Riva Patrizia Lucia MariaORCID

Abstract

New dynamics and globalized economy has led to the need to modify the Corporate Governance systems. Many countries have not identified a unique model for the company management but they allow free choice between continuing to use the traditional models adopted by the country itself or implementing different models sometimes considered more suitable with the aims and operational management of the companies. The new Corporate Governance model introduced in the most global jurisdictions is the two-tiers model (or dual model) considered the most suitable to achieve a better separation between ownership and control and to ensure a better transparency. The introduction of the two-tier system of Corporate Governance is not without uncertainty; it has affected all countries except the Anglo-Saxon ones. The purpose of this research is to investigate the features of the dualistic governance model in some countries different for their culture and legislative system. In particular the research aims to point out the characteristics of the dual model introduced for the first time in the Italian Legal System by Law No. 6/2003 and to perform a comparative analysis with the most consolidated two-tiers model implemented in Germany (which is considered the benchmark), in some other European countries (France and the Nordic countries) and with the experiences of Asian countries and in particular of Japan. From the comparative analysis we try to understand whether differences in purposes and ways of implementation can be pointed out

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference18 articles.

1. Abels P. B., Martelli T., CEO duality: how many hats are too many? in Corporate Governance, 2013

2. Banca d’Italia, Disposizioni di vigilanza in materia di organizzazione e governo societario delle banche, 2008, p. 7.

3. Barca F., I. Katsuhito, Pagano U., Trento S., The Divergence of the Italian and Japanese Corporate Governance Models: The Role of Institutional Shocks, in Economics Systems, 1999, pp 4-25

4. Bohinc R., Choosing between the US single Board or the European Two-Tier Board: A Brief Comparative Corporate Governance Analysis, papers, 2012

5. Bosetti L., Corporate governance e mercati globali, FrancoAngeli editore, Milano 2010, p. 112

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3