Affiliation:
1. The American University in Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
This paper provides an exploratory analysis of the extent of Sustainable Development Goals disclosure (SDGD) by the top 30 Egyptian companies. We use the 33 core indicators of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), which span economic, institutional, social, and environmental areas. Overall, the results suggest that SDGD in Egypt is still gaining traction, as indicated by a relatively low average disclosure score of only 25%, which translates to approximately eight indicators. We also document a variation in SDGD among the four areas, where disclosure addressing economic and institutional indicators is higher than that of social and environmental areas. This variation could be attributed to the differential regulatory and legal intensity. Disclosure is most noticeable for taxes, employment, women empowerment, financial transparency, corporate governance, and energy. We argue that Egypt has the legislative infrastructure and clear political will from the state to support sustainable development. However, there is a need for coordinated awareness efforts to establish a culture of sustainable development among various stakeholders, including businesses. Finally, there should be a stronger conviction regarding the importance of information sharing as well as comprehensive reporting standards and enhanced regulatory enforcement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to address the status of SDGD in Egypt. Accordingly, there is a need for future research that analyzes both the determinants of SDGD and its consequences
Reference20 articles.
1. Agarwal, N., Gneiting, U., & Mhlanga, R. (2017). Raising the bar: Rethinking the role of business in the Sustainable Development Goals (Oxfam Discussion Papers). Retrieved from https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/dp-raising-the-bar-business-sdgs-130217-en_0.pdf
2. Calvin, C. G., & Street, D. L. (2020). An analysis of Dow 30 global core indicator disclosures and environmental, social, and governance‐related ratings. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 31(3), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12123
3. Czerwińska, T., & Kaźmierkiewicz, P. (2015). ESG rating in investment risk analysis of companies listed on the public market in Poland. Economic Notes: Review of Banking, Finance and Monetary Economics, 44(2), 211–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12031
4. Garcia‐Sanchez, I. M., Cuadrado‐Ballesteros, B., & Sepulveda, C. (2014). Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors? Management Decision, 52(6), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2013-0446
5. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) & United Nations Global Compact (UN Global Compact). (2017). Business reporting on the SDGs: An analysis of the goals and targets. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/media/v5milwee/gri_ungc_business-reporting-on-sdgs_analysis-of-goals-and-targets.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献