Abstract
The intent of the paper is to understand which new scenarios and future figures could emerge with the Corporate Governance Industry Revolution 4.0, but also which professional figures could disappear, decrease in number or transform; also prefigure what changes could occur in the way of work performance, of new and old professions, in relation to the inevitable changes in production processes that will be introduced by this new industrial revolution. My point of view, of analysis, is clearly that of union representation, in all forms, and of workers. The question that I and I hope all the components of the trade unions are asking is: will we be able to be able to understand, represent and protect all the workers who will be involved in Industry 4.0? Clearly the writer does not pretend to find solutions, although from my observations, experience of representation can certainly provide suggestions and ideas, aided by the study and research still conducted by the major unions such as: CGIL-FIOM, CISL- FIM and UIL-UILM in Italy.
Reference59 articles.
1. Doyle, J. L., Colley, J., Stettinius, W., & Logan, G. (2005). What is corporate governance? New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. CSR RepTrak. (2017). How to use data to connect CSR and Reputation and be relevant for the business. Retrieved from https://www.reputationinstitute. com/sites/default/files/pdfs/2017-Italy-CSR-RepTrak.pdf
3. Agriyanto, R., Rohman, A., Ratmono, D., & Ghozali, I. (2016). Accrual based accounting implementation: An approach for modelling major decisions. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 6(4-special issue), 531-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/rgcv6i4siart12
4. Ahmad, M., & Alshbiel, S. (2016). Women in Jordanian banks and performance: Financial accounting measurement. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 6(3-1), 7-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/rcgv6i3c1art1
5. Alhadab, M. (2016). Auditor report and earnings management: Evidence from FTSE 350 companies in the UK. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 6(4-2), 334-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/rgcv6i4c2 art11