Affiliation:
1. Lebanese American University
Abstract
This study investigated the differences between the distribution of international and non-international students across majors at a southern private American university located in the southeast United States as well as issues related to decisions and selection of majors by these two groups and the implications of those decisions on the U.S. educational system. For this purpose, a database that included 3001 full-time undergraduates at this southern American university was used. Chi-square tests and logit regressions were used to analyze the data. The results of the study showed that there was a major difference between international and non-international students regarding the selection of majors. International students were less likely to be in a major that requires certification as a condition of employment in the United States. This study can help U.S. colleges and universities understand the needs of both American and international students and their patterns of enrollment at the undergraduate level. An improved understanding of the students’ patterns of enrollment will help American colleges and universities, educational leaders, educational board members, and policymakers, to better allocate their human, financial, and physical resources in order to meet students’ needs. If we consider the income from foreign students as international trade, education can be regarded as a major export with great potential for growth. This article examines some of the factors which may affect the attractiveness that American education holds for international students. It is one of the first research studies to explore the fields of study by international and non-international students.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference21 articles.
1. Agarwal, V. B., & Winkler, D. R. (1985). Foreign demand for United States higher education: A study of developing countries in the Eastern Hemisphere. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(3), 623-644. https://doi.org/10.1086/451482
2. Brademas, J. (1987). The politics of education: Conflict and consensus on Capitol Hill. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
3. Brooking Institution. (1975). The international dimension of management education. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
4. Bruni-Bossio, V., & Sheehan, N. T. (2013). Leveraging board expertise: Strategy mapping as teaching tool. The Journal of Business Strategy, 34(4), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-11-2012-0070
5. Cashman, G. D., Gillan, S. L., & Jun, C. (2012). Going overboard? On busy directors and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.003
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献