Abstract
Directive 2014/95, in force since 2017, is the first European step that requires companies to provide mandatory non-financial information (NFI). The regulation concerns sustainability information with the policy goal of increased accountability and comparability among European “public interest entities” on that matters. According to the framework of Regulatory Integrated Assessment (RIA), the study compares the disclosure before and after the Directive application considering the content (what) and the location of the information in companies’ reports (where). Content analysis is applied to both financial and non-financial reports to create a disclosure scoring index and an overlapping one. Thus to compare the ex-ante analysis to the ex-post by a quantitative scoring system. The research contributes to the debate on the regulatory policy evaluation examining whether the ex-post assessment reveals a change in companies’ reporting behaviour about non-financial information, i.e. if the regulation achieves its policy objectives of improving sustainability disclosure. Findings show differences between the ex-ante and the ex-post phase: after the enforcement of the Directive there is an increase in the degree of disclosure (what) and a reduction in the level of overlap (where), with more companies choosing “embedded” reports. These results are a preliminary step in the regulatory policy evaluation and they answer to the request of more studies on the ex-post implementation review of regulation.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference71 articles.
1. Allio, L. (2010). Keeping the centre of gravity work: Impact assessment scientific advice and regulatory reform. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1(1), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X0000009X
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (1994). Improving business reporting. A Customers focus. Meeting the information needs of investors and creditors, comprehensive report of the Special Committee on financial reporting. Retrieved from https://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/FRC/AccountingFinancialReporting/ DownloadableDocuments/Jenkins%20Committee%20Report.pdf
3. Baker, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). Pragmatism and new directions in social and environmental accountability research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(2), 263-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2012-01079
4. Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley S. A. (2004). A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.001
5. Bendotti, G., Carini, C., Teodori, C., & Veneziani, M. (2013). Content and quality of information: Analysis of the management discussion session in the Italian financial reports in the period 2003-2008. Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(4-2), 248-264. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i4c2art2
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献