Abstract
Most organizations regard Sustainable Development (SD) as important and within a tridimensional approach (including economic, social and environmental dimensions) SD comprises a range of complex issues. However, traditional management approaches do not capture the variabilities as organizations are complex adaptive systems embedded in a complex adaptive context. Consequently, there must be a fundamental shift towards a complexity theory approach (eg. Complex Adaptive Systems, CAS). When SD is viewed from a CAS approach it becomes a continuous process of co-evolution within a rapidly changing context rather than a once off project. Leaders, managers and practitioners work in this complex and rapidly shifting world need crucial skills such as reflection. This paper proposes a framework combining SD, CAS and reflection. Although a framework does not guarantee success it provides a tool to identify SD, CAS and reflection dimensions, develop an integrated approach, create goals, monitor and evaluate outcomes. Lastly, the paper includes management and research implications.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference91 articles.
1. Alaa, G. 2009. Derivation of Factors Facilitating Organizational Emergence Based On Complex Adaptive Systems and social autopoiesis theories. E:CO, 11: 19- 34.
2. Bagheri, A. and Hjorth, P. 2007. Planning for Sustainable Development: a Paradigm Shift Towards a Process-Based Approach. Sustainable Development, 15: 83–96.
3. Ballantyne, D. and Varey, R.J. 2008. The servicedominant logic and the future of marketing. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 36: 1-14.
4. Bannigan, K. and Moores, A. 2009. A model of professional thinking: Integrating reflective practice and evidence based practice. Revue Canadienne d‘Ergothérapie, 76: 342-350.
5. Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainability: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 197-218.