Affiliation:
1. Mu’tah University, Jordan
2. Liverpool John Moores University, the UK
Abstract
The study examines the impacts of using two dimensions of the technology acceptance model (TAM), perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, on the adoption of big data analytics in auditing, and the subsequent impact on audit quality. Five hypotheses were developed. A questionnaire survey was undertaken with external affiliated audit companies and offices in Jordan. Eventually, 130 usable questionnaires were collected, representing a 72.22% response rate. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed for diagnosing the measurement model, and to test the hypotheses of the study. The study finds that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a direct effect on audit quality, without mediating the actual use of data analytics. However, the use of big data analytics is shown to moderate the relationship between perceived usefulness and audit quality, but not between the perceived ease of use and audit quality. The study is one of the first to examine auditors’ acceptance of big data analytics in their work and the impact of this acceptance and actual use on audit quality. It contributes to the existing literature in auditing through its application of SEM to examine the impact of big data analytics usage on audit quality by using the TAM.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Finance
Reference72 articles.
1. Ada, Ş., & Yardimcioğlu, M. (2016). An empirical investigation of the antecedents of independent audit quality. In Proceedings of the MT International Conference on Business Research (pp. 10–19).
2. Al-Hajaya, K. (2019). The impact of audit committee effectiveness on audit quality: Evidence from the Middle East. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.8341
3. Alqatanani, K. M., & Hezabr, A. A. (2015). To what extent the auditors in the Kingdom of Bahrain recognize auditing strategies in the light information technology and what is impact on the audit? A field study. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(5), 698–711. Retrieved from http://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/3541.pdf
4. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Analytical procedures in external auditing: A comprehensive literature survey and framework for external audit analytics. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.01.001
5. Arnold, V. (2018). The changing technological environment and the future of behavioural research in accounting. Accounting and Finance, 58(3), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12218
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献