Citizens’ right to seek judicial review of administrative acts and its impact on governance reforms

Author:

Batalli Mirlinda1ORCID,Pepaj Islam1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Pristina “Hasan Prishtina”, the Republic of Kosovo

Abstract

This article analyses the right to judicial review of administrative acts and its impact on governance reforms as a result of the procedure conducted by a respective court. The article also evaluates and finds that examination of administrative acts by competent court strengths the rule of law and governance efficiency as a mechanism to guarantee the application of the principle of legality that requires that public authorities should act within a legal boundary and reasonable time to respect the citizen’s rights. Data analysis assumes on descriptive approach, an examination of the current legal framework governing the system, reports on the functioning of the oversight mechanism, empirical analyses of the topic, processed cases of administrative justice, and other published work. Administrative justice is not limited to the guarantee of citizens’ rights. Its justification also lies in the necessity to defend the public interest and to guarantee a balance between individual rights and the general interest (Woehrling, 2006). This study is of great significance and aims to contribute to the perceptive of judicial review proceedings as a narrow approach for the promotion of good administration and furthermore effective reforms. This study concludes that the administrative judiciary is one of the basic mechanisms that correct the illegal actions of the administrative bodies, prevents arbitrariness, and impact the governance reforms towards increasing efficiency, accountability, and transparency

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Finance

Reference49 articles.

1. Anthony, G. (2008). Judicial review in Northern Ireland. Oxford, England: Hart Publishing.

2. Batalli, M., & Pepaj, I. (2018). Increasing efficiency in public administration through a better system of administrative justice. Pécs Journal of International and European Law, 2018(2), 54–65. Retrieved from https://ceere.eu/pjiel/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/mirlinda.pdf

3. Bingham, L. (2007). The rule of law. The Cambridge Law Journal, 66(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197307000037

4. Brennan, J. (1986). The purpose and scope of judicial review. Australian Bar Review, 93–95.

5. Case of Golder v. The United Kingdom, Series A, No. 18, Application No. 4451/70 (ECHR 1975). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57496

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3